Re: [Open_Gaming] Marking PI and OGC

[kevin kenan]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> So EVERYTHING in your OGL-covered work that isn't Product Identity is Open
> Gaming Content.

What I've finally realized is that the definitions in section 1 have changed
the license more drastically then I thought. It used to be that OGC was
defined purely by what was in the shaded box (or however you decided to mark
it). In those proud days, section 8 was a critical piece of the license. Now
that the definitions of OGC and PI are in place, section 8's requirement is
mere bookkeeping. If the section was removed, the license would survive just
fine.

We must analyze each sentence according to the definitions of OGC and PI as
given in section 1. If the material in that sentence can be considered PI
and we want it to be PI then we must mark that sentence as PI. Otherwise we
must mark the sentence as OGC.

-kenan


-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org