You have to designate what is PI and what is OGC, however you see fit.
You can say "only that in the grey boxes is OGC" or "only that in
italics is PI." Or provide appendices. Or use a blue marker. It
doesn't matter, as long as it's "clear."
http://home.nycap.rr.com/steelstone/mental.zip for an example of easy
marking.
DM
kevin kenan wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brad Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> So EVERYTHING in your OGL-covered work that isn't Product Identity is Open
>> Gaming Content.
>
>
> What I've finally realized is that the definitions in section 1 have changed
> the license more drastically then I thought. It used to be that OGC was
> defined purely by what was in the shaded box (or however you decided to mark
> it). In those proud days, section 8 was a critical piece of the license. Now
> that the definitions of OGC and PI are in place, section 8's requirement is
> mere bookkeeping. If the section was removed, the license would survive just
> fine.
>
> We must analyze each sentence according to the definitions of OGC and PI as
> given in section 1. If the material in that sentence can be considered PI
> and we want it to be PI then we must mark that sentence as PI. Otherwise we
> must mark the sentence as OGC.
>
> -kenan
>
>
> -------------
> For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
