> Jaimi McEntire
>
> Look at #5:
<snip>
> And # 8:
>
> Both clearly state "If". Neither is there any text anywhere in the
> license agreement specifying that you must add or create additional
> open content, nor that your added content must become open.
That is correct. It is perfectly legal to redistribute OGC under the
license without adding anything new.
> Indeed, the definition of PI is only there for #7, which stops people
> from claiming compatibility (the "no coat-tails" clause).
#7 is far more than a no-coat-tails clause. It is the meat of the language
that prohibits other from using your Product Identity in any fashion.
Product Identity is also used in 1(d) where it says "<Open Gaming Content>
means any work covered by this License, including translations and
derivative works under copyright law, but specifically excludes Product
Identity. "
So EVERYTHING in your OGL-covered work that isn't Product Identity is Open
Gaming Content.
-Brad
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
