> kevin kenan > > This would mean that if you are using a rule that is marked as OGC in > another work, you wouldn't have to mark it as such in your work. I think that unless the prospective user had access to the original work (something that is far from guaranteed), you would have no way of knowing what was open and what was closed. It would be easier to tell for rules, but some people's idea of a rule is different than another's. Better to have the OGC marks persist through their derivatives. -Brad ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
