> kevin kenan > > The proposed wording change eliminates or minimizes these costs and > does so with very little downside. OGC doesn't have to be rules. THAT is the material you'll lose track of. -Brad ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Christopher DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Suggestion for OGL v1.0.1 Christopher DeLisle
