From: "Doug Meerschaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> kevin kenan wrote:
> > 8. Identification: If you distribute Open Game Content You must
> > clearly indicate which portions of the work that you are
> > distributing are new Open Game Content.
> A good idea. However, it's a bit much to *require.*
The current license already requires that you mark all OGC, new and
old. I'm suggesting that we limit the marking to just new OGC.
> > This would mean that if you are using a rule that is marked as OGC
> > in another work, you wouldn't have to mark it as such in your
> > work. Yet all new rules you create would have to be marked as
> > OGC. So you could create some new rules and describe them all in
> > an appendix which you could mark as OGC. The rest of your work
> > wouldn't have to repeatedly mark these things as OGC.
>
> Ugh. I don't like that at all.
Which part don't you like?
> Also, there are several creative ways to mark things as OGC without
> being repetetitve...
Since the OGL requires that you mark *all* OGC, I'm not sure how you
would do this except by marking everything as OGC. Tell us, please, of
these creative ways.
-kenan
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
