Personally,
For those times that called for "marking" I was personally planning on just using either italics or underline for those particular parts depending on my mood.
Out of curiosity though... how much of the various rules are going to become "official" to the d20 system. Ie. So far we've seen the "proposed" rules with the medieval/magic add ons. But part of the advantage that we're looking at will be the add-ons for other genre as well. In particular, I'm seeing the "Creatures of the Night" and "Superbeings" add ins. That's rather the point of it being the 'd20 system' and not the 'D&D system' right? Will these eventually become official, or shall we assume that only the initial Fantasy rules get tacked on to the initial setup?
curious,
-Bill
|From: "Doug Meerschaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|I have read Section 8. Many times. I could argue that if
|something is clearly indicated as open then it is marked either
|physically on the page or virtually in the reader's mind, but it
|doesn't matter. Since it makes everyone happy, I'll use the term
|"clearly indicated" instead of "marked." You can even read all my
|previous posts on this subject substituting "clearly indicate" for
|"mark" and my point remains the same.
|
|I still am curious how people intend to mark, er, clearly indicate OGC
|in works which heavily mix OGC and PI. The only strategy I know of is
|to create a list of PI and open everything else. This will minimize
|the risks I've written about before. It just doesn't seem to be a good
|strategy for people who are truly trying to protect their IP. If most
|of what I was creating was my own IP and I wanted to keep it closed,
|then I would want to open as little of it as possible.
