At 02:36 PM 4/15/2001 -0700, "Grok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Lets say for the sake of arguement that you release an entire world, >completely open. And for the same sake of arguement, lets say I get a hair >in my ass and decide I want to utterly screw with your work.. so I set up a >web page which introduces storeline concepts and changes you never intended. If you release an entire work as open, you are telling the world that it's OK to make use of it without restriction. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Justin Bacon
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Mike Mearls
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Justin Bacon
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Justin Bacon
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Justin Bacon
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Grok
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Grok
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Neal Rogers
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Grok
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity question Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] Product Identity ques... Ryan S. Dancey
