On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Greg Gliedman wrote: > > Wizards does have a certain amount of Quality control on the D20 > > Trademark.. the guide and liscence itself. If you don't comply then > > you're in break and Wizards (or really anyone) can say, "Hey Stop > > selling this and destroy it" Simple as that. > > But in the situation I'm discussing the party isn't a signatory to the > d20 license. Without being a party to the contract there can't be a > breach. Any remedy would have to come from straight trademark law, and > if all Wizards has is an abandoned license they have no case. How exactly has Wizards abandoned the D20 trademark? Having an open license for its use such as the D20STL does not constitute abandonment unless there have been major changes in the law since I graduated in '91. alec _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Mike Looney
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kele Kravelin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Robert Kozak
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
