> Faustus von Goethe > > My only assessment would be that it is the community. ie: Kal. No, the community has no standing to do so, no matter how appropriate it might seem at the time. Only the party who's OGC has been closed has any standing to seek to have a breach cured. The very best thing the community can do is contact the original copyright holder and get them to do it. Anything else is just as bad as the original violation. -Brad _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Mike Looney
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kele Kravelin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Robert Kozak
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Neal Rogers
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Lynn Fredricks
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
