On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Rob Lowry wrote: > I am not sure it falls under the auspices of the Free20 idea as it is > primarily meant to be a commercial product, but completely Open. That was the one aspect of Free20 that never made sense to me. You cannot make something under the OGL which has a requirement that OGC can only be used in works that are free of charge. That would be adding a restriction on to the use of OGC, which is directly prohibited by the terms of the OGL. I believe this idea was dropped but just in case it wasn't I thought I'd point this out. alec _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Rob Lowry
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Rory MacLeod
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Margaret Vining
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting John Farrell
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting John Farrell
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Adam Dray
- RE: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Ogf-l] Interest in Free/Community Setting Neal Rogers
