>Woodelf-
>
>Sounds like the real problem is your "preconceived
>notions of what an open game should look like."
ok, either i'm not understanding your line of reasoning, or one of us
is not being clear, or there is a difference of opinion on
definitions. please excuse if any of this message sounds
adversarial; i'm trying to be clear, but i'm not sure how it'll come
across in email.
[snip]
addendum to previous post:
sorry if i got a bit heated at the end. i'm getting ab it frustrated
by this, because i think i'm being as clear as i can be, yet your
responses make it clear to me that i'm not getting my point across
(because you're responding to very different arguments than i thought
i was making). it's one thing to have a difference of
opinion--that's life. i find it very frustrating to be unable to
communicate, however, because thene i don't even *know* if we agree
or not.
woodelf <*>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/woodelph/
An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. - Gandhi
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
