Clark Peterson wrote: >Did I just airball on this? Did Ryan approve of OGC >under the OGL through the GNU License? If so I missed >it an I appologize. > That's OK. I'm having a hard time FINDING a message where he did it. :(
> Also, if so, how did he reconcile >the Section 2 issue? > I believe he said that as long as none of the terms are conflicted, it was appropriate. So you have to follow BOTH the GPL and the OGL to the letter--which means that you need to have authoirty to contribute to both licneses, which makes GNU derivation problematic at least, unless I'm missing something here (which, not being a software developer or a lawyer, I probably am.) One sticking point was that only source code could be distributed under the OGL--not the compiled code. This, of course, is only Ryan's personal opinion--from what I remember of the conversation, it wasn't him acting as WotC's agent. Then again, maybe it was. DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
