>Sorry, you are confusing the OGL with the requirements of the D20STL. >There is no minimum requirement under the OGL. Of coure if you only mark >a single word as your OGC there really isn't a point to using the OGL. >But nothing in the license prevents someone from only having that little >OGC. (Since the license does not apply to any part of the work which is >not designated as Open Game Content, you could not have a work with 0 OGC >and claim it as released under the OGL.)
what about a work that you wanted to claim ownership over stuff that PI allows, but traditional IP law doesn't? couldn't you theoretically release a game under the WOGL, with no designated OGC, but some designated PI? it's doubtful whether doing so would actually give you control over any stuff that fell outside of trademark/copyright/patent, but within PI, but mightn't it be worth a shot? -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
