Brad Thompson wrote:
> Perhaps it is time to rethink how compilation-works should be 
> structured, given the nature of the OGL.  If the DNDCC were 
> to release the "Netbook of Feats" as a collection of 
> separately-licensed works, each bearing the original author's 
> name, then it would be easy to pick and choose which part to 
> use.  You could still publish a unified Netbook of Feats in 
> addition to the separate works, and if done carefully it 
> wouldn't take much effort at all.

This seems a good solution - publish each entry separately with its own
Section 15 and then publish the compilation with a "compiled" Section 15
of all the entries. Players would get the compilation with all the
correct entries in Section 15, and Publishers could go back to the
publication of the individual entry to get the minimal Section 15 text.

In practical terms, I'm not sure that I'd want to get a PDF of each
individual entry. It seems that the individual entries could be
published very easily on the web. I believe it would only require that
you create a page for each entry with a link to the OGL on each page.
You could dynamically insert the correct Section 15 (using database
entries or server-side includes, for example) based on which feat you
were linking from.

Regards,

Weldon Dodd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to