> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Moses Wolfy > Wildermuth > Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Ogf-l] Re: Draft HOWTO > > > > Then I'm afraid you've missed the point of Product Identity. The ENTIRE > > reason the Product Identity concept was created was to simplify the layout > > of OGC text by allowing non-OGC names to appear within OGC blocks without > > those names becoming OGC and without requiring possibly ugly layouts. > > There's no other benefit to PI. > > I have gone back and forth on this in my head, and I do see what you are > saying. I will consider it, but will probably continue as I have been, for > reasons that I will explain further.
I think that declaring the names as PI as a precaution makes a certain sort of sense, particularly because it protects you in case you forget and use the name in OGC. I think some have argued against needless PI declarations, but I don't remember the reasons. Martin L. Shoemaker Martin L. Shoemaker Consulting, Software Design and UML Training [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.MartinLShoemaker.com http://www.UMLBootCamp.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
