>From: John Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, lizard wrote:
> > John Kim wrote:
> > > Well, but I can legally use mind flayers in my adventure --
> > > right??  The concept of character copyright is that there exists a
> > > large set of creative work which goes into creating a character, not
> > > just a name.
> >
> > "Squid-headed psionic monsters" has a lot fewer antecedents than "space
> > knights". If you don't step on WOTC's toes, you'll be stepping on
> > Chaosiums. Calling them 'Illithid' really cuts too close.
>
>       Er, but I am *licensed* to use the specific creatures which
>are squid-headed monsters with four tentacles around their mouth that
>suck out brains.  They live underground and are lawful evil, and often
>work with Grimlocks, and speak Undercommon (although they prefer to
>communicate telepathically), etc.
>
>       All of this is in the SRD.  I am not treading on WotC's toes
>if I use these creatures, because WotC has sanctioned my use of them
>(presuming I comply with the Open Gaming License, of course).  The
>only issue is what name I give to them.

That was exactly my point.  We are licensced to USE the archetype of the 
"Mind Flayer".  Since a NAME or WORD per se cannot be copyright, then the 
only thing preventing us from calling it an Illithid could be trademark 
issues.

At least that is the way I understood it.

Faust

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to