> Have absolutely no idea what they are trying to say here, since they > directly contradict themselves. One of the requirements of the OGL is > that you include the OGL with the product -- it is impossible to be OGL > compliant without including the license. So I seriously doubt this is an > accurate interpretation of what WotC's lawyers (all two of them) said to > PCGen. If someone were to essentially follow the rules of the OGL and not > include the OGL itself, they are either in violation of the OGL or are a > copyright violation.
It seems to me that WotC, being the nice company that they are (and valuing the network effect of a compliant product more than the legal fees of their lawyers) would assume that anyone deriving from the SRD is trying to use the OGL and failing. Sure, they could send out legal nastygrams and haul the small guy into court--or they could just send a "compliance notice" and get another viable d20 producer to contribute to their network. DM --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Road Runner's Web-based e-mail. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
