In your message of 17 September 1999 you write:

> It is however different then the Win32 method as you correctly point out.
> 
> To what extent is the goal source code compatibility with the Microsoft ICD
> interface? I'll admit I did not understand this to be a primary requirement.
> However, I would imagine the differences could be hidden in macros.

I guess what really counts is a certain degree of application side
source compatibilty or at least make it easy for application people to
have a simple set of macros or wrapper routines.

- Thomas
-- 
             Thomas Roell   /\         An imperfect plan executed violently
             Xi Graphics   /  \/\ _     is far superior to a perfect plan. 
         [EMAIL PROTECTED]   /   /  \ \     
                         / Oelch! \ \             George Patton

Reply via email to