RE: [oglbase-discuss] OK, back to Re: 2nd draft:GL_EXT_get_proc_address spec

[John R. Dennis]

> I'm not comfortable with changing this semantic unless there is a
> compelling reason.  Applications which use multiple contexts are already
> prepared to handle per-context state and I do not see any burden with
> requiring the same for ext function pointers.

Michael makes a good and valid point here as long as you believe application
authors (and OGL implementors) understand the issues. My experience suggests
otherwise :-( Why not avoid as much confusion as we are able to? Just imagine
all the hours you'll save by not having to explain this over and over again, you
could go on vacation :-) Gee, now thats a goal I could live with...

John