Paul Bleisch wrote:
> 
> As someone else mentioned...  isn't this beyond the scope
> of oglbase?  I think this information better fits in
> the scope of something like glean/isfast.

As I said in the original message.  This was not intended to be
part of the spec.  It was merely a "heads-up" message with the
hope people would either say "good idea!" or "no, this is a
bad idea (and why)".  As I should have expected, it blew up.

-Brian

Reply via email to