Paul Bleisch wrote: > > As someone else mentioned... isn't this beyond the scope > of oglbase? I think this information better fits in > the scope of something like glean/isfast. As I said in the original message. This was not intended to be part of the spec. It was merely a "heads-up" message with the hope people would either say "good idea!" or "no, this is a bad idea (and why)". As I should have expected, it blew up. -Brian
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Ralph Giles
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings akin
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings David Blythe
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Paul Bleisch
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Michael Vance
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER st... Michael Vance
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERE... Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERE... Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER st... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Stephen J Baker
