On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:36:55AM -0800, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> Seriously: it's worth it, and easily abandoned if we can't even
> agree on a list of mandatory tokens and their order.
At risk of being a party pooper, I don't think this is something an
*ABI* standard should mandate. There have never been any cross-vendor
standards on this in the past, and any code that relies on a particular
value of the GL_RENDERER string has done so under an understanding with
some specific vendor.
Jon Leech
SGI
- [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Ralph Giles
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER st... Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings akin
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings David Blythe
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Paul Bleisch
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Brian Paul
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Bernd Kreimeier
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER strings Michael Vance
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] GL_RENDERER st... Thomas Roell
