Silly question: Isn't OL already one big wiki? Some pages are not specific 
bibliographical pages and can be edited normally. They are not editable by 
anyone but that's a matte of rights and groups of pages.
I think fragmentation is not a good thing. If we try to gather information in a 
wiki, why elsewhere then on OL.org?

kltrg

Am 13.03.2013 17:05, schrieb Karen Coyle:
> My only criteria for where the wiki is hosted is that it be
> 1) not dependent on an individual
> 2) preferably associated with a known "open" community or a stable 
> institution that promotes openness
> 
> I like the idea of joining forces with others in the open bibliographic 
> space. Unfortunately, so far I haven't found an appropriate place, but 
> keep hoping that there is something I have overlooked. ;-)
> 
> kc
> 
> 
> On 3/13/13 8:39 AM, John Rigdon wrote:
>>
>> I suggest we keep an "arm's distance" simply because we can do what we
>> want as a working "Friends of Open LIbrary.Org" (FOLIO) without having to
>> wait for approval, or guidelines.
>>
>> Several years ago the Friends of KIVA started up as a non-affiliated group
>> which was / is totally dedicated to support of KIVA, but we found early on
>> that we could do things ourselves within our group which supported the
>> mission of KIVA without having to get a sign off of all the folks there.
>> They have become and remain quite supportive of the user's group, but
>> don't feel the need to maintain oversite.
>>
>> As to where the WIKI is hosted if not on OL or IA, I don't think it
>> matters.  I could set one up on one of my servers and even go ahead and
>> register a domain name within a matter of minutes if that is agreed the
>> direction we need to go.
>>
>> John Rigdon
>>
>>
>>> I realize that it's confusing because the software and the groups use
>>> the same name, but I'm referring to:
>>>
>>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups
>>>
>>> We did discuss the possibility of hosting our own wiki somewhere, but 1)
>>> the Archive appears not to be interested and 2) we wanted someplace
>>> stable. OKFN doesn't have such a service available, so the offer of use
>>> of the mediawiki wiki group capability seems to be the best idea so far.
>>> Other ideas are of course welcome.
>>>
>>> kc
>>>
>>> On 3/13/13 8:21 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Karen Coyle <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Ol-techies,
>>>>
>>>>      During a discussion with the Open Bibliography sub-group of the Open
>>>>      Knowledge Foundation, it was suggested that we could become a
>>>> mediawiki
>>>>      group on http://mediawiki.org. This would give us full media-wiki
>>>>      capabilities and has an added advantage that it could stimulate
>>>> other
>>>>      bibliographic projects. I will hold a short call with a small group
>>>> to
>>>>      brainstorm on getting started and the structure of the initial
>>>> pages.
>>>>      But first I wanted to pass the idea along here and see if there are
>>>> any
>>>>      strong reactions one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As a point of clarification, MediaWiki is the name of the software (and
>>>> associated development project), so one doesn't really become a
>>>> MediaWiki group.  All you'd need to do is install it (or find a hosted
>>>> version somewhere).
>>>>
>>>> I think there are a few different, related questions here:
>>>>
>>>> - Is it useful to have a generally editable wiki that's easier to manage
>>>> than editing pages on the current openlibrary.org
>>>> <http://openlibrary.org> (which only a few people have access to)?
>>>>
>>>> - Is MediaWiki (the software) the right software for that or would one
>>>> of these others be better: http://www.wikimatrix.org/
>>>>
>>>> - Is it better to look for a hosted wiki service or install the chosen
>>>> software on OpenLibrary servers?
>>>>
>>>> - Does it make sense to have the wiki be affiliated with a group that
>>>> has similar goals such as Wikimedia Foundation? (Would make for easy
>>>> hosting & software selection, but has other implications)
>>>>
>>>> At least that's my take on it, but it was Karen's question!
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> [email protected] http://kcoyle.net
>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ol-tech mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
_______________________________________________
Ol-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to 
[email protected]

Reply via email to