Hi Maik,
though I haven't a very strong opinion on this matter, "free" vs
"usable" when "usable" implies non free softwares, I think this
question should be seriously discussed between us. I mean, we should
have a clear public position on this point.

jcl

2015-01-30 6:54 GMT+01:00 Maik Wagner <[email protected]>:
> Hello Kate,
>
> On 01/28/2015 07:48 PM, Kate Lebedeff wrote:
>>
>> This is a very good thing to do
>>
>> Do we qualify fully?
>
> I must say that I had a second thought about aligning our distribution to
> the Free Software Foundation guidelines. As far as the kernel is concerned
> we would need to take out binary firmware blobs which would in that we need
> to change the kernel and commit ourselves in using things like "gnash" as an
> alternative to Flash Player.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines
>
> In that respect I have taken a step back from this as people probably want
> the best desktop experience. As we did a survey recently we might want to
> include questions about "I prefer to have free software." vs. "I prefer to
> have the best possible experience in installing proprietary software."
>
> Have a good day,
>
>
>
> Maik
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org

Reply via email to