On Feb 3, 2015, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> wrote:
>Flash player is getting abandoned as HTML5 will be this year forced
>everywhere. So IMHO this is not an issue for now.
>
>Speaking of graphics drivers, I'm running nouveau and it works fine.
>Too
>bad that users who have latest devices from nVidia may not be fully
>satisfied because nouveau development is few steps back after nVidia
>closed
>source drivers.Second to get vdpau working with nouveau a firmware blob
>is
>still needed with open sourced drivers. I assume that in case of
>ATI/AMD
>drivers this is little bit worse.
>
>Anyways our default iso does not contain any closed software except
>kernel-firmware (WiFi support, gdy cards etc) and some blobs in kernel.
>
>Any other closed source software can be installed easily by running
>drakx
>tools.
>
>I was thinking to get a special udev rules to automatically install
>missing
>closed source software, to get better user experience.
>
>Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
>2 lut 2015 23:26 "Ben Bullard" <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>
>> +3
>>
>> I think this is most common.
>>
>> Ben Bullard
>> ben79
>> --------------------
>> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2015 12:22 PM, Davide Garatti wrote:
>>
>> +2
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally, do not know anyone who uses Linux OpenMandriva Lx or
>other
>> distributions (usually Fedora, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, Centos etc) that do
>not
>> immediately install nvidia drivers, codecs and flashplayer ......
>maybe
>> I'll be a strange case .... ..but these are my experiences.
>> Not I would jump on a street with no exits.
>>
>> Ciao
>>
>> --
>>
>> Davide_01
>>
>> www.linux-corner.it
>>
>>
>> In data sabato 31 gennaio 2015 16:17:40, symbianflo ha scritto:
>>
>> > +1
>>
>> > Nowadays users are looking for everything out-of-the-box
>>
>> > OMA might benefit of some donations from FSF, but
>>
>> > without users that install and use OMA , means that
>>
>> > openmandriva will be "another iso designed for vbox".
>>
>> > Now if the amount of those FSF donation would
>>
>> > be enough to keep OMA going , then you have my vote,
>>
>> > otherwise we are risking those few users that still
>>
>> > use omv.
>>
>> > Some numbers what out-of-the-box distro should be:
>>
>> > Hit on top: 1- multimedia ( mainly closed or plf)
>>
>> > 2 stability/usability ( funny only on second place...)
>>
>> > 3 networking and file sharing
>>
>> > 4 games, and playing experience
>>
>> > 5 look and feel
>>
>> > 6 enduser support and updates
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Il 31/01/2015 13:56, Jean-Claude Vanier ha scritto:
>>
>> > > Hi Maik,
>>
>> > > though I haven't a very strong opinion on this matter, "free" vs
>>
>> > > "usable" when "usable" implies non free softwares, I think this
>>
>> > > question should be seriously discussed between us. I mean, we
>should
>>
>> > > have a clear public position on this point.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > jcl
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > 2015-01-30 6:54 GMT+01:00 Maik Wagner <[email protected]>
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > >> Hello Kate,
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> On 01/28/2015 07:48 PM, Kate Lebedeff wrote:
>>
>> > >>> This is a very good thing to do
>>
>> > >>>
>>
>> > >>> Do we qualify fully?
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> I must say that I had a second thought about aligning our
>> distribution to
>>
>> > >> the Free Software Foundation guidelines. As far as the kernel is
>>
>> > >> concerned
>>
>> > >> we would need to take out binary firmware blobs which would in
>that we
>>
>> > >> need
>>
>> > >> to change the kernel and commit ourselves in using things like
>> "gnash" as
>>
>> > >> an alternative to Flash Player.
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> In that respect I have taken a step back from this as people
>probably
>>
>> > >> want
>>
>> > >> the best desktop experience. As we did a survey recently we
>might
>> want to
>>
>> > >> include questions about "I prefer to have free software." vs. "I
>> prefer
>>
>> > >> to
>>
>> > >> have the best possible experience in installing proprietary
>software."
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> Have a good day,
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >>
>>
>> > >> Maik
>>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>
>> > >> OM-Cooker mailing list
>>
>> > >> [email protected]
>>
>> > >>
>http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > _______________________________________________
>>
>> > > OM-Cooker mailing list
>>
>> > > [email protected]
>>
>> > >
>http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>>
>> > OM-Cooker mailing list
>>
>> > [email protected]
>>
>> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-Cooker mailing
>[email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>OM-Cooker mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
I think this would be awesome, to manage the non-free dkms install directly in
udev, +1 from me .
-- Sent from my Asus transformer pad with K-@ Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
