Hi, Can someone clarify to me if the Association has the power to withhold information like that? We want an official statement on behalf of the Association, and private channels were of no use? I'm asking politely for the decisions of the council to be made public, including the reason why POK was blocked from the public ML. What's next, start banning people from the Association to silence them?
Regards, Guilherme Moro On 23 July 2015 at 12:15, Alexander Khryukin <[email protected]> wrote: > I still not understand what Proyvind want. > > 2015-07-23 12:59 GMT+03:00 Guilherme Moro <[email protected]>: > >> Can we at least get a proper official response from the OMA foundation? >> I fully support Per in his claims, and is obvious that just trying to >> "hide" from the situation and postponing serious conversation is hurting >> everyone. >> The project keeps going in no direction for years, while me and so many >> others decided to stop helping from the lack of trust on the council >> capacity to deal with problems and act like the real intermediate >> representative for such discussions to happen, instead what we have now is >> a Foundation with no plans, no strategic view, controlled by who knows who >> (we actually know, but let's skip finger pointing for now), that have >> absolutely no transparency. >> Blocking Per on the lists is just a clear act of non-transparency, to not >> say despotism, and personal bias from the ones that have the control. >> So again, I reiterate, who is the representative of the Foundation that >> can come up here and have a proper discussion about the points raised? >> >> Regards, >> >> Guilherme Moro >> >> On 23 July 2015 at 08:03, Giuseppe Ghibò <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 22/07/2015 15:26, Marja van Waes wrote: >>> > If so, I'll be renaming moondrake to mandrake, while still keep signing >>> > with the authentic Mandrake key in my releases and repos,,, >>> > >>> > Well, I hope at least that I spark a discussion and brought up the >>> > severity of the situation for people to fully understand in what >>> > distress this project actually and also pave the ground for people to >>> > discuss problems with project and what their unhappy with, Many people >>> > are loosing interest and stopping to contribute... >>> > >>> > Thanks for your attempt to get things moving. I hope your mail will >>> > result in a strong revival of the project. >>> > >>> > Good luck all, >>> > Marja >>> > >>> > ________________ >>> >>> I read in other MLs that Per Øyvind was banned from from this mailing >>> list, so he can't write here anymore. Since he was historical >>> contributor, >>> can someone refer about this situation, or maybe it's just a technical >>> problem and he gone off-list just because of some technical issue (e.g. >>> mail bouncing exceed, etc.). >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Giuseppe. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
