Chris and Steve, Thanks for the time and effort put into this proposal.
One thing I do not see in the proposal is explanation of the “Support operators with high interest in ONAP (regardless of development resources involved) to be active in the TSC” item from the first slide. Reading the next slides it seems that only active contributors will be able to vote, so there is no guarantee operators who did not contribute yet will get a seat at the TSC. Would you care to elaborate on this please? Thanks, Ranny. From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris) Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal Dear TSC, Steve Terrill and I have put together a proposal to transition the TSC to its “steady state” by June 30, as required in the ONAP Technical Charter. We have tried to incorporate feedback from previous TSC discussions on this topic, and are proposing a structure that encourages diversity of companies and roles, while recognizing contributions in the community and interested operators who may have joined later, but who want to take an active role in ONAP. See attached. Under our proposal, the TSC will be composed of 15 elected representatives, with a cap of no more than two people per company. Anyone who is interested may run for a seat on the TSC. Voters in the election will consist of people who have been active in the community over the previous six month period, as demonstrated by one or more of {code contributions, code reviews, lira ticket submissions, readthedocs, wiki (pages or file uploads), or subcommittee leadership}. We are interested in feedback on our proposal (including community feedback), and would like to discuss this on tomorrow’s TSC call. Thanks, Chris & Steve
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
