Jason, Please see in-line.
Chris From: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 3:01 PM To: "Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)" <ranny.ha...@nokia.com<mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com>> Cc: Chris Donley <christopher.don...@huawei.com<mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>>, "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal Thanks, Chris & Steve for the proposal. A couple quick comments/clarifications: - Should Eligible Voter Criteria also be Eligible TSC Candidate Criteria? The previous slide just says candidates have to come from the ONAP Community, but not clear what that definition is. We purposely separated them. Literally anyone would be eligible to run for the TSC. However, the voting criteria requires that voters were active in one or more of several different ways prior to the election. - How often will TSC elections be held? I ask because the Eligible Voter Criteria is limited to previous 6 months of activity. Annually (per Charter). We’re proposing to measure eligibility over the previous six months to take into account people who became inactive. - Do you think that wiki/file contribution will capture all the active subcommittee members? That’s our intention. To me, “active” means more than attending calls – someone should have made a presentation or provided some feedback (which would show up on the wiki) - It might be good to outline how the 2 members/company will be enforced. I assume it would be the top 2 Condorcet vote recipients from each company? Once we collect self-nominations, we conduct the vote using Condorcet and get a ranked list of preferences. We could do it as you suggest, or LF could approach the company and allow one or more of the candidates to step down (assuming more than two are in the top 15). Thanks again. Regards, Jason Hunt Executive Software Architect, IBM Phone: 314-749-7422 Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> Twitter: @DJHunt From: "Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)" <ranny.ha...@nokia.com<mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com>> To: "Christopher Donley (Chris)" <christopher.don...@huawei.com<mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>>, "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Date: 04/04/2018 04:47 PM Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal Sent by: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> ________________________________ Chris and Steve, Thanks for the time and effort put into this proposal. One thing I do not see in the proposal is explanation of the “Support operators with high interest in ONAP (regardless of development resources involved) to be active in the TSC” item from the first slide. Reading the next slides it seems that only active contributors will be able to vote, so there is no guarantee operators who did not contribute yet will get a seat at the TSC. Would you care to elaborate on this please? Thanks, Ranny. From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris) Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal Dear TSC, Steve Terrill and I have put together a proposal to transition the TSC to its “steady state” by June 30, as required in the ONAP Technical Charter. We have tried to incorporate feedback from previous TSC discussions on this topic, and are proposing a structure that encourages diversity of companies and roles, while recognizing contributions in the community and interested operators who may have joined later, but who want to take an active role in ONAP. See attached. Under our proposal, the TSC will be composed of 15 elected representatives, with a cap of no more than two people per company. Anyone who is interested may run for a seat on the TSC. Voters in the election will consist of people who have been active in the community over the previous six month period, as demonstrated by one or more of {code contributions, code reviews, lira ticket submissions, readthedocs, wiki (pages or file uploads), or subcommittee leadership}. We are interested in feedback on our proposal (including community feedback), and would like to discuss this on tomorrow’s TSC call. Thanks, Chris & Steve _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=ImgDY7IpkfCme0DgSOggR5cKrCJbgfdXBRcKpytqQhY&s=-hsupv7_zmNWoVHmKyrWff8tsuDacsO-0vlKeUBWL54&e=
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
