Thanks, Chris & Steve for the proposal. A couple quick
comments/clarifications:
- Should Eligible Voter Criteria also be Eligible TSC Candidate Criteria?
The previous slide just says candidates have to come from the ONAP
Community, but not clear what that definition is.
- How often will TSC elections be held? I ask because the Eligible Voter
Criteria is limited to previous 6 months of activity.
- Do you think that wiki/file contribution will capture all the active
subcommittee members?
- It might be good to outline how the 2 members/company will be enforced.
I assume it would be the top 2 Condorcet vote recipients from each
company?
Thanks again.
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect, IBM
Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
From: "Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)" <ranny.ha...@nokia.com>
To: "Christopher Donley (Chris)" <christopher.don...@huawei.com>,
"onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Date: 04/04/2018 04:47 PM
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Sent by: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Chris and Steve,
Thanks for the time and effort put into this proposal.
One thing I do not see in the proposal is explanation of the “Support
operators with high interest in ONAP (regardless of development resources
involved) to be active in the TSC” item from the first slide. Reading the
next slides it seems that only active contributors will be able to vote,
so there is no guarantee operators who did not contribute yet will get a
seat at the TSC. Would you care to elaborate on this please?
Thanks,
Ranny.
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> On
Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Dear TSC,
Steve Terrill and I have put together a proposal to transition the TSC to
its “steady state” by June 30, as required in the ONAP Technical Charter.
We have tried to incorporate feedback from previous TSC discussions on
this topic, and are proposing a structure that encourages diversity of
companies and roles, while recognizing contributions in the community and
interested operators who may have joined later, but who want to take an
active role in ONAP. See attached.
Under our proposal, the TSC will be composed of 15 elected
representatives, with a cap of no more than two people per company. Anyone
who is interested may run for a seat on the TSC. Voters in the election
will consist of people who have been active in the community over the
previous six month period, as demonstrated by one or more of {code
contributions, code reviews, lira ticket submissions, readthedocs, wiki
(pages or file uploads), or subcommittee leadership}.
We are interested in feedback on our proposal (including community
feedback), and would like to discuss this on tomorrow’s TSC call.
Thanks,
Chris & Steve
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=ImgDY7IpkfCme0DgSOggR5cKrCJbgfdXBRcKpytqQhY&s=-hsupv7_zmNWoVHmKyrWff8tsuDacsO-0vlKeUBWL54&e=
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
