> I understand this as some form of taking revenge on Oracle (but this > might only be my interpretation), which, I think, anybody in the > community should avoid at all, given the generous move of Oracle to > donate OpenOffice.org to ASF.
This exactly is "seeing only one side of the coin" I wrote in my mail. Yes, if you do not have any OOo history, then Oracle did a good thing. My opinion is that they did good thing but they have chosen the worst way to do it. I think that anyone in the community is free to express they own opinions. And their opinions depend on their knowledge, history and current mood. > But - as this directly stoke into my eye when trying "White Label > Office" - if done so, it will clearly not be allowed to have a > "Donate..." button on the Welcome Screen as "White Label Office" now > has (btw: I would advise not to use [email protected] as PayPal > account as it negatively adds to the image of trying to be "official" > and will be away soon anyhow; even more offtopic, it might even be > good for TOOo to change to a name without OOo in it to have a clear > cut and avoid any suspicion) or even have any reference to TOOo. Then, > I think, TOOo would really help to improve the transition. ... but I agree with the rest of your message and expect TOOo to answer to your questions HERE ;-) -- Pavel Janík
