--- Mer 4/1/12, Rob Weir <[email protected]> ha scritto: ... > > It doesn't make sense to me that all of the above must use > a different name than "OpenOffice", since some of them are > exactly equal to OpenOffice, just changing by distribution > or packaging mechanism. > > For example, once Pedro has a BSD port working, and is > ready to distribute it, what would it be called? "BSD > Office"? Or could it be called "Apache OpenOffice, BSD > Edition" That is a good example of a port. >
Neither: it will be the FreeBSD Apache Openffice port, not unlike the FreeBSD OpenOffice.org port: http://www.freshports.org/editors/openoffice.org-3/ or the FreeBSD Apache httpd port: http://www.freshports.org/www/apache22/ Our packaging system builds everything directly from the sources and we don't really do enough changes to justify rebranding. cheers, Pedro.
