On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Simon Phipps <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 Mar 2012, at 00:25, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> It may be better to emphasize the questions that will have a useful >> lifetime of much more than the time it will take to achieve consensus >> on the responses. > > Actually, it's looking pretty good already. My experience of FAQs is that a > good FAQ starts small and is dynamic, changing with the questions that are > current in the project. I see no reason to assume it will take weeks of delay > to have a stable set of questions and answers that can then form the core of > future activity. >
With 22 of 33 revisions coming from you, I assume it would meet with your satisfaction. But if you are happy with it now, maybe take a break and let someone else get in and edit? -Rob > > S. >
