On 14 Mar 2012, at 00:54, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Simon Phipps <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 14 Mar 2012, at 00:25, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> It may be better to emphasize the questions that will have a useful >>> lifetime of much more than the time it will take to achieve consensus >>> on the responses. >> >> Actually, it's looking pretty good already. My experience of FAQs is that a >> good FAQ starts small and is dynamic, changing with the questions that are >> current in the project. I see no reason to assume it will take weeks of >> delay to have a stable set of questions and answers that can then form the >> core of future activity. >> > > With 22 of 33 revisions coming from you, I assume it would meet with > your satisfaction. But if you are happy with it now, maybe take a > break and let someone else get in and edit?
First you complain I do nothing, now you're unhappy I do too much. Impossible to please :-) Seriously though, getting a page started in a wiki in public is like that; you don't perfect it offline, you hack it online and every "save" looks like a revision to the outsider. It's quiesced now, knock yourself out. S.
