Sorry Simon. Thanks for trying, better luck in the future.


----- Original Message -----
> From: Simon Phipps <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Clarifying facts
> 
> 
> On 14 Mar 2012, at 02:36, Rob Weir wrote:
>> 
>>  Let's see if anyone else thinks this is too verbose.  Remember, 
> FAQ's
>>  are not intended to be read as an article, one after another.
>>  Typically they are things we we link to and point users to for
>>  specific questions.
> 
> Since you have essentially eliminated my contributions and replaced them with 
> something different, I'll withdraw from this activity until the partisan 
> style you've chosen changes. A pity as we genuinely had some collaboration 
> sparking between unlike minds.
> 
> As an added bonus you'll not have to worry about any edit locks :-)
> 
> S.
>

Reply via email to