On 1/5/2012 19:33, Terry wrote:
Why have you sent a copy to me personally? That is quite unnecessary.
I thought you could use the two copies to demonstrate that either it is
a straightforward matter to filter them separately, or it is not.
Actually, I am indebted to our fellow poster, Paul, for his pass-along
from Gmail. I had to look at the expanded headers to find the exact
format (List-Id), and customize Tb to accept that. I suggest that it is
a non-trivial exercise for the average user. The resulting new filter is
currently in testing. --/tj/
----- Original Message -----
From: TJ Frazier<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Forum name in subject
On 1/5/2012 18:56, Terry wrote:
Surely it is a straightforward matter to filter all emails addressed to
[email protected]
Surely it is not. You should get two copies of this particular email
(I'll get three). Try to filter your pair into different folders. It may
be possible, by using deep-inside headers; it would not in the least be
straightforward. --/tj/
----- Original Message -----
From: James Knott<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: Forum name in subject
Mike Scott wrote:
On 04/01/2012 23:19, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Rob,
Good point. If there is no one who uses this list that
objects in the
time window, I'll take it to ooo-dev and from there as appropriate.
- Dennis
A mild objection here... prefixes at the start of the subject
line clutter
a limited screen space. I loath them, and there are better ways of
achieving the
end that don't involve overloading the subject text.
Would it not be better to use an email header to flag the source,
then
those that want can use their mail reader to file in suitable places.
(I
currently crudely filter on 'to' address and
'return-path' to
achieve this)
I'm probably a minority of one though :-)
Please explain how that flag will enable sorting on mail list, as I
mentioned
earlier? With a list name in the subject, sorting the mail list by
subject
results in all list messages grouped together. Also, in this day&
age, is
display space really an issue. Sure, I could filter into different
folders, but
that's is not the way I want to read the vast majority of mail I
read.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: TJ Frazier<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2012 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: Forum name in subject
On 1/5/2012 06:22, Harold Fuchs wrote:
"James Knott"<[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
Most of the mail lists I participate in include something to
indicate
the forum name in the message subject. This makes it a lot
easier to
identify mail list messages from what might otherwise look
like spam.
Is it possible for this list to do the same? IIRC, the old
OOo list
included "Users" in the subject line and
libreOffice includes
"libreoffice-users".
Isn't the name in the To: header? And isn't that header
visible to
all?
Harold Fuchs
London, England
I strongly favor adding to the subject, because:
(1) The "To:" header is not visible until I open the message.
(I might
configure Tb to display it, at the cost of not displaying something
more
useful.)
(2) When the message has "To: Albert CC: ListA, ListB", and I
subscribe to both lists, I get two identical copies (three, if I'm
Albert),
which any filter is going to assign to the same folder (whichever
filter runs
first *must* catch both copies). With subject markers, I can filter
that easily.
-- /tj/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
