Bill, as I am somewhat allergic to installers I always build my own Rexxen and I find that getting this process to work pays off at a favorable rate; if you define the box as 'developer machine' at install chances are that you need nothing extra; then it is ./bootstrap ; ./configure ; sudo make install and you are ready to go.
In this case you might need to find out how to do a 32bit build, but this is exactly the list to ask that question on when it is not obvious. Other than that, you might eliminate the problem altogether by using JDBC like Rony stated. best regards, René Jansen. On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:20:42 -0500, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > I've just about reached the limit on my patience... > > My Linux system is a 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04, and that may be part of the > problem. > I am not an expert Linux user/programmer and so have not found "all" > of > the ways to get around issues. > > I've had 64-bit ooRexx 4.1.0 installed, but as you may know from my > previous emails, I need to run the 32-bit version so that I can use > REXXSQL to access some databases from Linux. > > > I tried to download the 32 bit version of ooRexx 4.1.0 from > Sourceforge > > > > The file downloads and immediately invokes the GDebi 0.6.0ubuntu2 > installer - there does not appear to be any way for me to download > the > package and "just save it" without getting this attempted automatic > install. (I prefer using the Synaptic Package Manager, but have also > had some experience in using the APT command line commands.) > > > Since the download package is a 32-bit, and my system is a 64-bit I > immediately get the error message: Wrong architecture 'I386' > and there is no way that I know of to save the download file so that > I > can use APT... nor does there appear to be a way to override the > "Architecture" error message. (I do have the IA-32 package > installed, > and have had for a long time.) > > I went to the RexxLA website to see if I could "rename" the file > during > the download process - and discovered that the links there for ooRexx > 4.1.0 are pointing to apparently non-existant locations at > Sourceforge. > > So, I went back to SourceForge to see if any of the Save "link as" > functions would work, and they will not due to the fact that > Sourceforge > in there infinite wisdom ALWAYS displays a web page now when you try > to > download. Even the "direct link" references points to a web page... > > Any suggestions? > > /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
