On Saturday 13 May 2006 06:11, Timothy Miller wrote: > My reasoning here is that everything you described is something that > is supportable by the "3D pipeline" that we had defined. I make no > claim that this design is an optimal one!
<snip> > Also, you've made statements that you believe that 3D isn't > appropriate. Ok, fine. If you're right, then it shouldn't be too > hard to convince me with solid logical argument. I have a history of > changing my mind in the face of arguments that run counter to my > preconceived notions. My guess is that the 2D support for OG's engine will be ready long before the OpenGL drivers are, so Ray might get what he wants by not upgrading to then newer drivers with 3D... ;-) _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
