On 6/5/06, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

This is why I highly encourage Traversal to follow a
simple dual-licensing strategy (GPL and proprietary)
and to NOT license anything under the LGPL.
Dual-licensing GPL/proprietary maximizes the users'
freedom and Traversal's profit at the same time, by
ensuring that another company can't "run off" with the
design, improve it, and not give back the
improvements.

I agree, and I have been transitioning in that direction.  Perhaps we
should scour the wiki and make sure this is consistent.

First of all, Traversal makes HARDWARE.  Although we may participate
in FOSS software development in the future, what we sell is hardware.
All Traversal hardware will be licensed under GPL and also available
under a commercial license for a fee.

As for software, I'm not going to control what other people do, but I
am going to recommend that drivers and such be licensed under MIT and
BSD licenses.  That is, any driver code I write for Traversal hardware
will be under one of those licenses.  If it needs to be converted to
GPL for the purposes of inclusion in like the Linux kernel, I have no
problem with that.

In the event that we work on some end-user app, we'll decide what to
do at that time.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to