-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Timothy Miller wrote: > On 6/20/06, Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:20, Timothy Miller wrote: >>> Perhaps I made my announcement prematurely, so I'd like to go >>> into some more detail about what we did, with our assumptions, >>> and see >> what >>> everyone else thinks. >>> >>> First of all, we do not want to switch parts if we can avoid >>> it. Using the ECP2-50 has advantages in price, saves us two >>> weeks on >> OGD1, >>> and if we can cram a good 3D design into it, that saves us on >>> die >> area >>> an >> >> [deleted] >> >> Two questions... >> >> How much more expensive? >> >> OK. It's one... But money talks, so I'll give it a weighting of >> 2x... If it isn't too expensive, I say take the 2 weeks and doit. >> > > The actual price difference depends on volume. Suffice it to say > that I think we can still hit our original developer price point > and be okay. >
Oh well. Go the Spartan's then... Might as well use a chip that's big enough. We'd kick ourselves more when the Lattice turned out to be too small, and the Spartan will give us some headroom for blowout... H -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEmQTN/3QXwQQkZYwRApX9AKDAQmqlv26i3io9PawablCEJymqzwCgzGOf 32lLyWDzpFw7rd4zviSZIRI= =jugl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
