On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 07:38:28PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Joe Landman > <land...@scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> > >> Please check these news items: > >> > >> http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscsi-iops/ > >> > >> http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01/19/1000000-iops-with-iscsi--thats-not-a-typo > >> > >> http://www.infostor.com/index/blogs_new/dave_simpson_storage/blogs/infostor/dave_simpon_storage/post987_37501094375591341.html > >> > >> "1,030,000 IOPS over a single 10 Gb Ethernet link" > > > > This is less than 1us per IOP. Interesting. Their hardware may not > > actually support this. 10GbE typically is 7-10us, though ConnectX and some > > others get down to 2ish. > > Which I/O depth has been used in the test ? Latency matters most with > an I/O depth of one and is almost irrelevant for high I/O depth > values. >
iirc outstanding I/Os was 20 in that benchmark. -- Pasi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
