Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release

[Craig L Russell]

This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting the incubator)?

Craig

On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote:

Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant release?

I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run the tests

against DB2. I believe Dave's team has.

Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is?

On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
get that issue resolved if possible.

I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why
OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later?

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

by email and then delete it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
>
> On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Michael-
> >
> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >
> > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to
> > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the
> > > extra jar then the vote can proceed.
> >
> > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the
> > docbook jar to justify starting another release.
>

> > now, my vote changes to +0.
> >
> >
> > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take
> another look
> over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow.
>
> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> get that issue resolved if possible.
>
>
> --
> -Michael Dick
>


and then delete it.

_____________________________________________________________________ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the majority. For Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email

--
-Michael Dick

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature