Craig and others, Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222... A couple of weeks ago, DaveW committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for OPENJPA-182. The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues.
This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort. As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress expected function. Thanks, Kevin On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting the incubator)? Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant release? Craig On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run > the tests > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. > > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? > > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to >>> get that issue resolved if possible. >> >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? >> >> -Patrick >> >> -- >> Patrick Linskey >> BEA Systems, Inc. >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> __ >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> contain >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> affiliated >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> and/or >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> individual >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> recipient, >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return >> this >> by email and then delete it. >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release >> > >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Michael- >> > > >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: >> > > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed. >> > > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release. >> > >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the >> majority. For >> > > now, my vote changes to +0. >> > > >> > > >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take >> > another look >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. >> > >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to >> > get that issue resolved if possible. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -Michael Dick >> > >> >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> contain >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> affiliated >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> and/or >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> individual or >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> recipient, and >> have received this message in error, please immediately return >> this by email >> and then delete it. >> > > > > -- > -Michael Dick Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
