Comparing the 1.6.22.2 module builds from the SL packaging, where the kABI 
hashes of the used symbols are stored as a requirement, is seems none of those 
hashes changed between -693 and -830.

There are two differences in the configure results:

-ac_cv_linux_header_sched_signal_h=no
+ac_cv_linux_header_sched_signal_h=yes

-ac_cv_linux_struct_file_operations_has_iterate=no
+ac_cv_linux_struct_file_operations_has_iterate=yes

And there's quite a bit of churn in include/linux.fs.h (and some in key.h).

> On 1. Feb 2018, at 16:58, Gary Gatling <gsgat...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> 
> Ok. This gets weirder. Any directory under /afs says Not a directory. But I 
> can read files like
> 
> /afs/eos.ncsu.edu/software/inventory/software_inventory
> 
> just fine. 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Gary Gatling <gsgat...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> I don't get a kernel panic but instead I get:
> 
> [gsgatlin@localhost ~]$ ls /afs/
> ls: reading directory /afs/: Not a directory
> [gsgatlin@localhost ~]$ 
> 
> 
> which is pretty weird. I don't see anything in the syslog about problems with 
> openafs
> 
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost systemd: Starting OpenAFS Client Service...
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: libafs: loading out-of-tree module taints 
> kernel.
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: libafs: module license 
> 'http://www.openafs.org/dl/license10.html' taints kernel.
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: libafs: module verification failed: 
> signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: Key type afs_pag registered
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: enabling dynamically allocated vcaches
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost kernel: Starting AFS cache scan...Memory cache: 
> Allocating 1600 dcache entries...found 0 non-empty cache files (0%).
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost afsd: afsd: All AFS daemons started.
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost afsd: afsd: All AFS daemons started.
> Feb  1 10:44:24 localhost systemd: Started OpenAFS Client Service.
> 
> I am using openafs-1.6.22
> 
> 
> with
> 
> correct-m4-conditionals-in-curses.m4.patch
> linux-test-for-vfswrite-rather-than-vfsread.patch
> linux-use-kernelread-kernelwrite-when-vfs-varian.patch
> 
> from the arch linux distro in my rpm packages.
> 
> Anyone know what 
> 
> ls: reading directory /afs/: Not a directory
> 
> means and is there some way around it?
> 
> Also, is 1.6.22.2 coming out soon?
> 
> Thanks so much,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Kodiak Firesmith <kfiresm...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/WgPsSUCLK5ojxIuH3
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Kodiak Firesmith <kfiresm...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> Folks, re-sending this because the first try never hit the list - perhaps 
> mail with attachments are silently dropped or held for manual moderation?  
> I'd originally attached an image of the stack trace.  I'll host it and reply 
> to this with a  URL link in case that would also result in a drop or 
> moderation.
> 
> 
> 
> Anyhow:  
> 
> In testing the new RHEL 7.5 beta, we've discovered that hosts using AFS fail 
> to boot after the upgrade, with Openafs 1.6.22.1 installed.  
> 
> We are wondering if some of the non-guaranteed kernel ABIs that OpenAFS uses 
> might have changed with the latest kernel provided in RHEL 7.  
> 
> I've attached a picture of the trace.
> 
> Anyone else kicking the tires on the new RHEL yet?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany



_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to