> On 2. Feb 2018, at 02:14, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:11:24PM +0100, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>> Comparing the 18.104.22.168 module builds from the SL packaging, where the kABI
>> hashes of the used symbols are stored as a requirement, is seems none of
>> those hashes changed between -693 and -830.
>> There are two differences in the configure results:
> That's very helpful to know.
> Does the new tree actually have a sched/signal.h header?
Yes it does. The only content is a guarded include of <linux/sched.h>
> Does the new struct file_operations have an 'iterate' member
Yes it does, wrapped in a RH_KABI_ITERATE macro.
> (The idea being to tell whether they changed something in new and
> interesting ways or our configure test(s) are broken.)
It's the former :-(
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
OpenAFS-info mailing list