> On 2. Feb 2018, at 09:55, Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wies...@desy.de> wrote:
>> On 2. Feb 2018, at 02:14, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:11:24PM +0100, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>> Comparing the 22.214.171.124 module builds from the SL packaging, where the kABI
>>> hashes of the used symbols are stored as a requirement, is seems none of
>>> those hashes changed between -693 and -830.
>>> There are two differences in the configure results:
>> That's very helpful to know.
>> Does the new tree actually have a sched/signal.h header?
> Yes it does. The only content is a guarded include of <linux/sched.h>
>> Does the new struct file_operations have an 'iterate' member
> Yes it does, wrapped in a RH_KABI_ITERATE macro.
er, nonsense, that's RH_KABI_EXTEND, sorry
>> (The idea being to tell whether they changed something in new and
>> interesting ways or our configure test(s) are broken.)
> It's the former :-(
OpenAFS-info mailing list