I don't know. I just think that if you're going to put something on a
resume, thus indicating that you're familiar with it, then you go and
place it in a design category... It just seems to me that those two
messages conflict with each other. You're either lying, or ignorant.
CF exists on the server-side of a web application - which is exactly the
same as PHP, JSP, or any other server-side language. Calling a
server-side language an aspect of design indicates that you're
unfamiliar with software stacks, or unfamiliar where CF fits in a
software stack.
Now... if the person writing the resume put PHP, JSP, or other
server-side languages in with design, I may be inclined to be more
lenient simply because it would seem more like a terminology issue. But
putting PHP under programming then CF under design is just plain wrong
when you compare where each piece of server software is in the stack.
-Jordan
On 02/08/2011 04:33 PM, Alan Williamson wrote:
Jordan, the fault is not his. Or is it?
We have to look beyond what we all think and look to what others think. This
is not an isolated case. Talking with agencies etc, cfml is definitely not put
in the same category as php.
--
http://alan.blog-city.com/
--
tag/function ref: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/
mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
Get to Texas in Feb for OpenCFSummit http://www.opencfsummit.org/
