Re: OODL: Interpreter Implementation Variances [important!]

[Anonymous]

At 10:41 AM +1000 on 6/16/99, Adrian Sutton wrote:
>> Here are differences between Interpreter and HyperCard. These are the
>> planned ones; these are here by design. Does anyone think they will be a
>> major problem?
>>
>> Additional constants:
>>
>>  e [anyone have a better character for this?] 2.718281828459
>>   // anyone have a better e? I tried to generate one with
>>   // (1+1/big_number)^(big_number) but HC underflowed...
>
>I have the first 10 million digits of e (only the first 2 million have been
>checked though) that I found on the internet.  How many digits did you want?
>:)  I'll go through and find quite a few sites and make sure they all agree
>so that our e is accurate.

Hmmm... 40 should be more than enough.