----------
>From: DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: OODL: Interpreter Implementation Variances [important!]
>Date: Wed, Jun 16, 1999, 1:41 PM
>
> At 10:41 AM +1000 on 6/16/99, Adrian Sutton wrote:
>>> Here are differences between Interpreter and HyperCard. These are the
>>> planned ones; these are here by design. Does anyone think they will be a
>>> major problem?
>>>
>>> Additional constants:
>>>
>>> e [anyone have a better character for this?] 2.718281828459
>>> // anyone have a better e? I tried to generate one with
>>> // (1+1/big_number)^(big_number) but HC underflowed...
>>
>>I have the first 10 million digits of e (only the first 2 million have been
>>checked though) that I found on the internet. How many digits did you want?
>>:) I'll go through and find quite a few sites and make sure they all agree
>>so that our e is accurate.
>
> Hmmm... 40 should be more than enough.
This should cover it:
2.718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966
967627724076630353547594571382178525166427427466391932003059
921817413596629043572900334295260595630738132328627943490763
233829880753195251019011573834187930702154089149934884167509
In fact it's a fair bit more than you wanted but oh well. Probably just the
first line would be overkill.
