>>Anthony,
>>
>> as long as it is still possible to have a variable named "e", this is fine
>>by me.
>
> Hmmm... thise does open up a lot of possibilities. Presently you can't have
> a variable called e; that's why I'd like a better character. Preferably an
> illegal one. (for example, option-p [�] for pi).
>
> But I wonder if predefined varaibles are sensible?
I like the idea of having a couple of useful maths numbers predefined, but
you're right, we need a better character than e. I'll look into it, but
someone else should too if they get a chance, I'm going on holidays as of
tomorrow. (I might be in contact but I'm not sure.)
Adrian Sutton.
