Re: OODL: Interpreter Implementation Variances [important!]

[Anonymous]

> Here are differences between Interpreter and HyperCard. These are the
> planned ones; these are here by design. Does anyone think they will be a
> major problem?
>
> Additional constants:
>
>  e [anyone have a better character for this?] 2.718281828459
>   // anyone have a better e? I tried to generate one with
>   // (1+1/big_number)^(big_number) but HC underflowed...

I have the first 10 million digits of e (only the first 2 million have been
checked though) that I found on the internet.  How many digits did you want?
:)  I'll go through and find quite a few sites and make sure they all agree
so that our e is accurate.

Adrian.